"YOUNG MAN! SIT DOWN! SIT DOWN!
YOU ARE AN ENTHUSIAST.
WHEN GOD PLEASES TO CONVERT THE HEATHEN,
HE WILL DO IT WITHOUT YOUR AID OR MINE!"
The words that adorn (for the dire want of a better description) the
beginning of this article are attributed to one John Ryland Senior when
William Carey, William Fuller and others of like mind spoke at a
Minister's Fraternal meeting about seeking to convert the heathen in
India and other places to saving faith in Jesus Christ. I have seen
this story disputed (I forget the source at the moment) on the basis
that Ryland never referred to it at all. I note that Laurence Vance uses the word "supposedly" in relation to it. I have read of the speech being "perhaps with some embellishment"
(Sketches of Church History by SM Houghton, BOT) while Peter Masters
from the Metropolitan Tabernacle (Spurgeon's) in a public address
indicated that, although basically true, the words are really a
paraphrase of what was actually said.
If true (and I am not entertaining any doubts on the matter) then these
words display a horrible Hyper Calvinistic spirit, totally inconsistent
with true Biblical Calvinism. True, authentic Calvinism believes that
when it pleases God to convert the heathen, not only will He raise up
missionaries to go forth an reach them with the gospel, but that He has already displayed that pleasure and has already
been raising up missionaries to fulfill His divine will and will
continue so to do until the end of the age. John Calvin himself
was a strong believer in the conversion of the heathen through gospel
preaching. He wrote: "It is no small consolation to godly teachers that,
although the larger part of the world does not listen to Christ, He has His
sheep whom He knows and by whom He is also known. They must do their utmost to
bring the whole world into Christ's fold, but when they do not succeed as they
would wish, they must be satisfied with the single thought that those who are
sheep will be collected together by their work." (Comment on John 10:27)
Understandably - but only to a certain point - Ryland's words have been
greedily seized upon by those who oppose Calvinism and who argue that
it destroys the burden of evangelism and the need of world missions
etc., However the story of William Carey is much bigger than one quote,
paraphrased or otherwise, by John Ryland Senior. If we are going
to examine the role of the Calvinists in this incident, then please
consider the following facts and then decide whether John Ryland Senior
should be allowed to be the representative Calvinist as our opponents
make him out to be. There is a certain shallowness and indeed injustice
that seizes upon an individual quote and tries to effectively father
it, or the thinking that lie behind it, on a whole school of
thought.
* William Carey himself was a Five Point Calvinist. This important
point is usually overlooked by those who repeat this incident to
discredit Calvinism. David Cloud never bothers telling it, as can be
seen here and here. Terry McGovern
failed to do so when first reporting the incident for the purposes
of discrediting Calvinism's input to missionary work. Laurence Vance
does so, but doggedly, and in my opinion very foolishly, fights on
maintaining that Carey was an inconsistent Calvinist. I do not know
what Dave Hunt wrote on the matter and I will hold my counsel until I
gain more information.
* Carey's missionary friends were likewise Five Point Calvinists. Andrew Fuller was perhaps the best known among them. A helpful page on his Calvinism is found here and worth perusing.
* The interest of Carey and his friends in missionary work was stirred,
at least in part, by a book written by Jonathan Edwards of
Northhampton, New England. Jonathan Edwards was another Five Point Calvinist and one of America's greatest soul winners, witnessing real, true revival in his church. Edward's book was entitled: "A
humble attempt to promote explicit agreement and visible union of God's
people in extraordinary prayer for the revival of religion and the
advancement of Christ's Kingdom on earth." which you can access here
in its online edition. There could hardly be a more practical outcome
to this book than having men of Carey's zeal and calibre offering
themselves for missionary service with the subsequent results.
* Twelve ministers from Ryland's denomination formed the "Particular
(Calvinistic) Baptist (Missionary) Society, sacrificially contributing
the initial sum of £13 2s. 6d which was all they could afford. These men were all Five Point Calvinists. This society is still operating today.
* Five Point
Calvinist, William Carey, one of the above twelve, had already
published a small pamphlet urging Christians to use all the means at
their disposal in missionary effort. This booklet was entitled: "An Enquiry into the Obligations
of Christians to Use Means for the Conversion of the
Heathens in which the Religious State of the Different Nations of the World, the Success of Former Undertakings, and the Practicability of Further Undertakings, are Considered." The title is immediately followed by Paul's inspired missionary argument drawn from Romans 10: 10-15. You can read it here in its online edition.
* Five Point Calvinist Andrew Fuller published is book called "Gospel Worthy of all Exception." (Online edition here) The Hyper Calvinist's loathed it, but it was well received by those Calvinists of Calvin's own stamp. Later CH Spurgeon (another Five Point Calvinist) would refer to this book as a "classic of our faith" and mention it in the same breath as "Hodge's Outlines" and "Owen on the Spirit". Spurgeon also considered Fuller to be "the greatest theologian of his century" (cited Laws, Andrew Fuller, 127) and felt "so honoured" in the fact that he had been branded as a "Fullerite" (MTP: 12:68)
* In all my reading of books on Calvinism or by Calvinist writers, I have never seen any Calvinist since defend John Ryland
Senior's remarks. We have all been so quick to put as much ground as we can between us on him on this issue.
* The practical refusal of those who oppose Calvinism to hardly
acknowledge the existence of Hyper Calvinism (as opposed to real,
authentic Calvinism) displays either gross ignorance of the subject or
a desire to blacken the names and stands of good men. Phil Johnstone's primer on Hyper Calvinism is a good place to start.
* Much opposition to Carey and friends came not only from the Hyper
Calvinists but also from the Socinians whose presence and influence
riddled many of the mainline denominations. However, all true
Calvinists (and others) supported these men in their endeavours.
* It would be interesting to see a list of those who supported or
encouraged these Five Point Calvinists in their soul winning work. We
know that the Missionary Society in that hotbed of Five Point Calvinism
in Princeton University wrote to encourage William Carey in 1821. John
Calhoun in his History of Princeton records that the Princeton students wrote, "The
different names by which we are known in the Christian church, and the
different views we take of points not essential, will not be suffered
to affect our feelings towards you, or to damp our joy at your
success."
* Why is it that those who are so opposed to the Doctrines of Grace are
prepared to ignore the many examples of Calvinistic missionaries in
order to highlight this one example of Ryland senior? If the definition
of a missionary is one who leaves his homeland to preach the gospel in
another, then Calvin himself was a missionary.
Furthermore, his church in Geneva sent forth young men as missionaries
to Brazil. These young Calvinists perished on the mission field. To say
that any Calvinist missionary is the EXCEPTION rather than the rule
(David Cloud's emphasis) is surely a non starter of an argument. Surely
that can be said of missionaries from any doctrinal position? How many
members does your denomination have? What percentage of them are on the
mission field? Anything less than 50% of the membership being actively
involved is the exception rather than the rule.
* We see similar tactics used by the enemies of Calvinism in regards to
Spurgeon. Again, David Cloud likes to remind us all that many Hyper
Calvinists opposed Spurgeon in his indiscriminate gospel appeals -
except Cloud seems to have a phobia about using this term "Hyper Calvinists" and somewhat mischievously brands them as "Calvinists".
What he doesn't tell his readers is that many prominent Five Point
Calvinists agreed with Spurgeon, including the eminent Presbyterian
John Kennedy of Dingwall in the Scottish Highlands (who brought
Spurgeon to open his new church building) and many other Scots
Presbyterians. ("Dinnae forget Spurgeon"
was the cry of one Scots wife to her husband going into the
nearest market town) and other men like the Bonar brothers etc.,
Spurgeon's sermons saw great circulation, among Calvinists and non
Calvinists alike, including the Five Point Calvinists in
the Southern Presbyterian Church in the USA. It was only when
Spurgeon criticised slavery that the sales fell somewhat in those
quarters, but his warm evangelistic Calvinism matched their own and he
was popular on that account. Incidentally, the Calvinists of today
still love Spurgeon and seek to see his sermons circulated. Our own
site here has a Spurgeon Index and it is only the lack of time (which I
must spend in evangelising, and I do, I do) that prevents me from
adding more to it. We happily link to SPURGEON ARCHIVES on our links page.
This is a theme I would like to develope as more information becomes
available. However, I believe I have done enough here to show that the
Calvinists in the situation are best represented by Carey and his
friends rather than by one man.
THE END