Cork Free Presbyterian Church, 10 Briarscourt
(Annex) Shanakiel, Cork, Ireland
Pastor: Colin Maxwell. Email: colin.maxwell@fpcmission.org
FREE PRESBYTERIAN ISSUES -- GOSPEL ISSUES -- PROTESTANT ISSUES -- EVANGELISM ISSUES --CALVINISM
ISSUES -- C.H. SPURGEON INDEX --SERMON NOTES -- MAIN PAGE
WHY ARE WE PRESBYTERIAN?
READ: ACTS 15:1-32/16:1-4 [WHY ARE WE PRESBYTERIAN?]
And as they went through the cities,
they delivered them the decrees for to keep, that were ordained of the
apostles and elders which were at Jerusalem. (Acts 16:4)
The unique trait/Presbyterianism not:
Calvinism or infant baptism but its form/Church Government.
Alternatives:
[1] Episcopacy
[2] Congregationalism
[3] Limited
Congregationalism (Baptists)
All work if undertook by spiritual people.
Although a secondary matter...yet important for us to know where/why we
stand.
1) RULE OF ELDERS - A COMMON BELIEF WITH OTHERS:
A/ Two main offices/congregation:
Elder and Deacon
Key passage: Acts 6:1-4
Note: Dividing duties
into the "mundane" & the "spiritual"
Some were to be taken
up/distinctly spiritual duties i.e. the elders. 1 Timothy 5:17 provides
link along: idea/teaching elder i.e. minister.
B/ Elders: not self elected: Acts
20:28
Also elected by a vote (Acts 14:23)
Ordain: stretch out/hand for
purpose of giving a vote (Vincent)
Who can vote: not revealed but
common vote among saved membership/least problems.
Little room for
complaint afterwards.
C/ Should be the aim of every church to have its own elders: Acts 14:23/Titus 1:5
At this stage we are in agreement with Baptists/Congregationalists &c.,
2) THE FIRST PRESBYTERY IN THE NEW TESTAMENT:
Before we explore this: Autonomous
Church: not found/NT
Only argument: Individual epistles were written to
individual congregations..
No argument at all…it does not
overthrow Presbyterianism which also has individual
congregations.
We have a stronger argument again:
A/ Acts 15:1 We are in the congregation at Antioch. A good church! Acts 11:26/13:2
B/ A problem! Acts 15:1 False teaching (Galatians 1:8) & so v2 Row and a half!
C/ What did this church do? Note: v2: "Elders" presbuterous
In v4ff the elders of the churches/Jerusalem came together to discuss/debate the matter.
Here we have a presbytery:
[1] Elders present (v6) Along/apostles - they discussed matter.
[2] Matter was debated (v7)
Really…debate ought not to have been prolonged (Galatians 1:8)
but remember: transitional period.
[3] What saith/Scriptures? Guiding star (v7-11/15-17)
[4] Thorough (v12) Presbytery business must be.
[5] James the Moderator summed up: (v13) Cp 12:17/21:18
[6] A decision was reached (v19-21) Carried (v22) This decision was seen to be the mind/Spirit (v28)
D/ Authoritative? Crunch issue. Only
advice? Recommendation?
A problem in one congregation being
discussed/debated & an answer given by elders in others.
If only
advice - autonomy is preserved.
If binding…autonomy gone:
Are we
looking here at Presbyterianism?
Ans:- Acts 16:4 decrees to be
kept:
Not merely in Jerusalem and/or Antioch…but in every
city.
Word decree = dogma Same word: Luke 2:1/Acts 17:7 Law!
Word for to keep = phulasso A very strong word: 12:4/1 Timothy 6:20/2 Timothy 2:19/1 John 5:13/Jude 20
Nothing weak here!
E/ Some object: Ref: "the church"
(v4/22) along with "multitude" (v12)
Is this congregationalism?
Ans:-
The "Church" may be understood = those in authority.
Whole is put for
the part: Multitude = elders from many churches.
Perhaps whole church =
all the believers.
There to welcome (v4)
There for the send off (v22)
The business in the middle was conducted by the elders/apostles (v6)
This was not a free for all. This was for those called to rule/church.
Not fit/novices.
F/ This was not a one-off meeting:
Acts 21:18
We are not told how often they met.
Evident from
Bible…often individual church sessions met (Acts 20:17) with
local matters/agenda.
G/ Presbytery not only solves disputes…but also ordained men to the ministry: 1 Timothy 4:14
3) THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ELDER:
A/ No light thing to be called to be
an elder.
Humanly speaking: what if these men had fudged the issue/took
side/Legalists?
[Might mention also: What if the
Christians had rejected Presbyterianism & ignored these
binding decrees from Presbytery?]
B/ No less than 3 passages: 1 Timothy
3/Titus 1/1 Peter 5
Main qualification is:
[1] Holy living
[2]
Soundness/doctrine
[3] Wisdom.
Although new converts are not ideal (1
Timothy 3:6) young men are not to be barred if they otherwise
qualify (1 Timothy 4:12)
C/ Worth saying: Bishop = elder. 1
Peter 5:1-2 The address to the elders (v1) was to take the
episcopacy (v2) of the flock.
RECAP:
[1] We believe in rule/elders. Ever pray for them. A church with good elders go places/God. Make/break witness.
[2] Presbyterian government is "founded on/agreeable to the word/God"
[3] Only those Biblically fit should serve as elders.
THE END
FREE PRESBYTERIAN ISSUES -- GOSPEL ISSUES -- PROTESTANT ISSUES -- EVANGELISM ISSUES --CALVINISM
ISSUES -- C.H. SPURGEON INDEX --SERMON NOTES -- MAIN PAGE