Any comments on this page? Email: colin.maxwell@fpcmission.org

|
ONCE SAVED ALWAYS SAVED?
Jesus Christ said: My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: And I give
unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any
man pluck them out of my hand. (John 10:27-28)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|  |
There
are two distinct groups in the evangelical Church which are not happy
with the above statement. The first group are obviously the Arminians
who believe that a man can be saved and lost. We all believe that men
can be lost and saved (Luke 19:10) but the Arminians allow for the
possibility of a man being truly saved at some point in time and yet
spending eternity in hell because of real apostasy from God. Suffice to
say that I reject such a thought as:
[i] Overthrowing the decree of God
[ii] Overthrowing the efficacy of the blood of Christ which was
shed specifically to keep the elect of God out of hell and all that
leads to it
[iii] Overthrowing the power of the Holy Spirit to
preserve Christians from apostasy.
Such a belief does not negate in any way the responsibility of every
Christian to heed the warning verses and Calvinists and others who
believe in the eternal security of the saints are no less concerned
about Hebrews 6 and Hebrews 10 etc., than our Arminian brethren.
Another group, however, are not happy with the "Once saved…always saved"
concept are many who do subscribe to the doctrine of the eternal
security of the people of God. This may surprise some folk, but there
is good reason for the concern. The eternal security doctrine has been
abused by some who believe that since they have made a profession of
faith, then they will be in Heaven no matter what they do. Did they not
receive Christ as their Saviour in a meeting some years ago? Did they
not go to the front or sign a card or raise a hand? Did not the
"sinner's prayer" seal the issue for all eternity? Are not their sins,
then, forever dealt with? Well, if so…what's the problem?
The problem is this. While we
are saved and kept by Christ alone (1 Peter 1:5) yet part of the
evidence that we are indeed saved is by our good works i.e. holy
living. We were not saved in our sins or saved for our sins…but
saved from our sins (Matthew 1:21) By grace through faith unto good
works (Ephesians 2:8-10) is the order of scriptures. Chosen in Christ
to be holy (Ephesians 1:4)…conformed unto the image of His Son
(Romans 8:29) is how it is stated elsewhere. If there is no holiness,
then no matter what we did some years ago or thought we did will get us
into Heaven. We are not saved by holiness (legalism)* but salvation is
evidenced by it, just as the tree is evidenced by its fruit. A real
Christian (Christ-one) is Christ-like.
Therefore instead of "Once saved…always saved" it might be better if we closed up a rather smug loophole which self deceived professors have exploited and believe instead: "If saved…always saved."
This maintains the truth of the eternal security of the people of God
while leaving room for that vital examination which is urged upon us by
the Apostle Paul himself (2 Corinthians 13:5) Obviously no one is
urging an excessive introspection which (having got us to take our eyes
of Christ) would plunge us all into despair. But it is profitable to
take time to weigh ourselves in the balances of Scriptures and see if
we are really manifesting those evidences of the new birth (1 John) If
we do and we are…we will rejoice all the more in what Christ has
accomplished for us. Far better this, than to wake up in hell and
discover that our hope was that of the hypocrite which will perish (Job
8:13)
Helpful words from H.A. Ironside: "People say, “I see you believe in that old Baptist doctrine of ‘once in
grace, always in grace.’” Or another says, “I understand you hold that old
Presbyterian idea of ‘the final perseverance of the saints.’” I do not know why
this should be called either Baptist or Presbyterian, only to the extent that
Baptists and Presbyterians agree with the Book, and the Word of God clearly
shows that once God takes us up in grace nothing can separate us from the love
of Christ so that evidently the expression, “once in grace, always in grace,” is
a perfectly correct one. But, on the other hand, I am not so enthusiastic about
the other expression, “the perseverance of the saints.” I believe in it; I
believe that all saints--all really belonging to God--will persevere to the end,
for the Book tells me, “He that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be
saved” (Matthew 24:13), and if a man starts out and makes a profession but gives
it all up, he will never be saved, because he was never born again to begin
with, he was never truly changed by grace divine. On the other hand, the reason
he endures to the end is not because of any particular perseverance of his own.
What I believe in, and what the Word of God clearly teaches, is the perseverance
of the Holy Spirit. When He begins a work, He never gives up until it is
completed. That is our confidence." (Eternal Security of the Believer)
THE END
* A critic found fault with this wording. It might be better worded: "We
are not saved by trusting in our holiness (which would be legalism) but
salvation is evidenced by it (holiness), just as the tree is evidenced
by its fruit. A real Christ (Christ-one) is Christ-like.