Any comments on this page? Email: colin.maxwell@fpcmission.org
DID CHRIST PURCHASE WITH HIS OWN BLOOD THE APOSTATES IN 2 PETER 2:1?
But
there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be
false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies,
even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift
destruction.
If He did, then here is solid evidence
that He died for those other than His own elect because these men
(being damnable heretics) are in hell. How do Calvinists answer this
objection to our doctrine of Particular Redemption i.e. that all for
whom Christ died will eventually be saved and be in Heaven? Read on!
In keeping with the general tenor of
Scripture that God cannot know frustration in those things which He
sets out to do (Isaiah 46:10 etc.,) we believe that their purchase was
professed and not actual i.e. they denied the Lord whom they professed
to have bought them.
This is no novel way of explaining the Scriptures as may be seen from the following examples:
1) In 1 John 1:10 we read that those who say that they have not sinned, "make God a liar" Question: Do they actually make Him to be a liar...or do they (by their denial of His charges against them) profess
Him to be a liar? Obviously the latter. No one can make anybody (never
mind God) an actual liar - the only one who can actually make you a
liar is yourself (i.e. when you tell lies) But anyone can profess you
to be a liar - just spread the rumour and the deed is done. It was on
this principle that Potiphar's wife got Joseph sent to prison for
adultery - it was professed rather than actual.
2) Is it actually
foolishness to preach the Cross? (1 Corinthians 1:21) If so...how could
the all wise God command or bless it? Or is it only foolishness as professed by an unbelieving world? Obviously the latter.
3) The Amalekite (2 Samuel 1:16) professed
to have killed King Saul. However the Holy Spirit inspired narrative
denies his story. In 1 Samuel 31:1-5 we read that Saul actually fell
upon his own sword and was already dead...yet the Amalekite was dealt
with on the basis of his profession and slain.
So here in 2 Peter 2:1 These damnable heretics, professing to be redeemed by Christ's blood, are dealt with accordingly.
If Christ actually did purchase these
apostates with His own blood - just the same way He actually did
purchase His church (Acts 20:28) - we are left with the following
scenario:
Christ died for all the sins of the
apostates. All manner of sins may be viewed here e.g. those outlined in
Mark 7:21-22 evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts,
covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye,
blasphemy, pride, foolishness etc., But these apostates have another
sin laid to their charge which the ordinary sinner may not be guilty of
i.e. apostasy. A man who never professed faith can never turn back from
what he never professed. Let's think therefore about this particular
sin of apostasy.
Is there pardon for sin of apostasy?
Decidedly there is not, because by its very definition, it admits of no
pardon. It is assuredly final...the man who commits it stepping over a
boundary line of no return. Judas committed this sin and
perished...Peter didn't (although he cursed Christ) and found pardon.
We may conclude that there is no forgiveness for the sin of apostasy.
Did Christ die for the sin of
apostasy? Either He did or He didn't. If He didn't...then obviously He
did not die for all their sins. No matter how you look at it, this
limits the atonement. There is a fuller atonement in the thought that
Christ died for every last sin of His elect.
If Christ did die for the sin of
apostasy...why is there no pardon for it? Why should this sin - paid
for in full and included in that great cry "It is finished" -
hinder the apostate more than any other sin for which the Saviour is
said to have made full atonement?
Would the Saviour make atonement for a sin that could not be pardoned? What would be the point?
If we bring the foreknowledge of God
into the debate, would the Saviour die for all the other sins of a man
whom He foreknew would commit apostasy and never enter into the benefit
of them?
[Note: We may
widen these questions out...would the Saviour suffer for the sins of
any man who dies in sin, knowing that they would never enter into the
benefit of them? Would the Saviour suffer for the sins of those who
have never had the gospel preached to them at all and are not numbered
among the elect i.e. those OT heathen nations and many heathen nations
today? Was Christ obliged to die for the sins of any man? Assuming your
answer is "No" (Grace demands a negative reply) then is He obliged to
die for the sins of all men?]
CONCLUSION
For the reasons given above, the
Calvinist concludes that Christ did not actually redeem at any time the
apostates mentioned in 2 Peter 2:1 They are judged according to their
profession.
THE END